Scientific Beta

Money Management: "While a score-based approach to environmental, social and governance (ESG) serves the interest of ratings providers, it is not always a useful guide for investors and could lead to increased risk. According to Scientific Beta, in its paper ‘Scoring against ESG? Avoiding the pitfalls of ESG scores in portfolio construction’, scoring was not found to guide investors on ESG investing."

Money Management 18/12/2020

"(...) While a score-based approach to environmental, social and governance (ESG) serves the interest of ratings providers, it is not always a useful guide for investors and could lead to increased risk. According to Scientific Beta, in its paper ‘Scoring against ESG? Avoiding the pitfalls of ESG scores in portfolio construction’, scoring was not found to guide investors on ESG investing. There were numerous different types of scoring, definitions and data available which created inconsistences and led to subjective assessments being made. This echoed previous criticism by the OECD who said ESG scores should not be viewed as a meaningful indicator of a strategy’s ESG goals. It was particularly the case when it came to the environmental and the fight against climate change and the rise in greenwashing. (...)"